I Found A Californian Dumber Than Lindsey Lohan

California is a beautiful place to live.  It has nice weather, beautiful beaches and plenty of things to do.  However, California has also provided some of the dumbest people to have ever appeared in the public spotlight.  Making a run for the top of the list, are the members of the California Air Resources Board that give even the likes of Lindsey Lohan a run for title of “most idiotic”.

Today I saw an article on Fox News “California Passes Sweeping Auto Emissions Standards.” The article in part stated that new rules unanimously passed by the California Air Resources Board:

“require that one in seven of the new cars sold in the state in 2025 be an electric or other zero-emission vehicle.

Are they really lacking so much intelligence as to suggest that they will dictate what people can and cannot buy?  How will this be enforced?  Will dealers have to put up “not for sale yet” signs till they meet the soviet style, centrally planned mandates?  Will they have to tell their customers, “sorry you cannot buy that car, but you can buy this electric car that is liable to catch on fire.”  If the people want something, they will buy it.  Do not force it down our throats with mandates such as these.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Politics

It’s Progressivism, Not Democrats That Is the Cancer

The Republican primaries are drawing nearer and nearer, and now the latest front runner, not named Mitt Romney is Newt Gingrich.  Some people say, “anyone other than Mitt Romney,” and for a while I agreed with them, but now I have to ask a question.  Is Newt Gingrich better than Mitt Romney?  That is the question I will look at in my next post, but let me first give you something to think about, hat tip to Glenn Beck.  What is really the problem in America, is it overspending or is it progressivism?  Is it over-taxation or is it progressivism?  Is it corruption or is it progressivism? Is it over-regulation or is it progressivism?  Let Glenn Beck answer those question, and that in turn will frame my answer to the Newt vs. Romney question for my next post.  Watch Glenn Beck’s speech before CPAC in 2010

 Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Shipping Down to Philly

Jonathan Papelbon

The 2011-2012 Major League Baseball season ended in disappointing fashion for the Boston Red Sox when they squandered a 9 game lead and failed to make the postseason.  The off-season was sure to bring big changes for the team, and to begin, the shock waves from this historic collapse cost manager Terry Francona his job.  Then the next bombshell dropped, general manager Theo Epstein left the Red Sox to join the Chicago Cubs.  Then, this past Friday afternoon then first big move of free agency was announced, closer Jonathan Papelbon is taking his river dance to Philadelphia.

The news of Papelbon’s departure saddened me.  Papelbon had been my favorite Red Sox player since he made his Major League debut in July of 2005.  His intensity and craziness on and off the field endeared him to me from the beginning, reminding me of myself.  Some of my favorite memories of the Red Sox involve him.   Who could ever forget him telling David Letterman that his dog ate the ball from the last out of the World Series, or the images of him river dancing after they won in 2007?

My family is from Philly and are all Phillies’ fans, and while the Red Sox are my first love, the Phillies are my National League team.  I am sad to see Papelbon go, but I am happy to see that Jonathan Papelbon is at least going to a team that I like and wish him the best of luck.  He should put up great numbers going from the AL East to the National league.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Way Out There On a Limb

I will make a prediction that people will say is insane, but I do not believe we have seen Terry Francona’s last day as Manager of the Red Sox.  I just get that feeling, that we will see Francona in a Red Sox uniform again someday.  I get this feeling especially since Francona removed himself from consideration for several manager positions to take some time off.

5 Comments

Filed under Baseball

Wall Street Protests Stink

If the nine most terrifying words in the English language for a conservative are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” For a liberal protestor the three scariest words must be, “it’s bath time!”

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

You Will Be Sorely Missed

Yesterday it was announced that the reign of Terry Francona as manager of the Boston Red Sox has come to an end.  As manager he did something that no Red Sox manager did in nearly a century, win a World Series title, and he brought the city of Boston two of them.  He led the Red Sox to 5 playoff berths, 1 division title, 3 ALCS appearances, 2 pennants, two championships, a 744-552 record and a whole lot of happiness that Boston baseball fans hadn’t had in years over his 8 year run as manager.  He held the team together through the tough times and the happy times.   This past year he seemed unable to do so an decided it was time for a change.  For all he has  done for the city of Boston and its fans, Terry (Tito) Francona will be sorely missed.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

9/11: A Series of Double Dactyls

A recent assignment for my Critical Thinking class was to write a reflection on 9/11, incorporating certain viewpoints (Bush’s and bin Laden’s speeches, as well as our own thoughts) and asking, “What is the difference between war and terrorism?” This was my response, which I am reposting here.

Nearly ten years ago,
Nine-slash-eleven: a
Day that forever in
Infamy lies,
Acts were committed so
Ultra-abhorrently,
All through America
Tears flowed from eyes.

Back when this happened, though,
I was a youngster, and
Though I was told of these
Crimes in our land,
Children aren’t typically
Realizational;
Yes, I was sad, but did
Not understand.

President Bush, in his
Speech, spoke of justice and
Told all the people that
Life would go on;
Nationalistically
Promised Americans:
“We will keep fighting ’til
Evil is gone.”

Terrorist leader O-
sama bin Laden claimed,
“You are the reason that
Blood has been shed.
Overoppressively
Harming my countrymen;
We will not stop ’til your
Tyranny’s dead.”

Now that I’m older, I
See much more clearly, and
Microanalysis
Helps me see too.
I don’t know much of the
War that Osama was
Talking about, but his
Claims could be true.

Whether or not, though, it’s
Never excusable;
Killing civilians and
Blowing up planes?
Those are atrocities
Ultradespicable!
Yet, if you think, just one
Question remains.

What is the difference ‘twixt
Fighters and terrorists?
Listen: the latter have
Horrible claims;
Overexcessively
Causing malevolence,
All for the goal of a-
chieving their aims.

Fighters, contrastingly,
Also defend and are
Willing to sacrifice;
That is the key!
These people never act
Unpatriotically,
Laying their lives down for
You and for me.

Do you recall when in
May, people watched as the
President told us: “bin
Laden’s no more”?
Next, what transpired were such
Grand celebrations so
Ultraexuberant;
Joy was in store.

Nearly ten years ago
Nine-slash-eleven, when
People were stunned by the
Crash of a jet;
Time has passed on, but in
Hyperreflectiveness,
We, as the people, will
Never forget.

8 Comments

Filed under Politics, Random Thoughts

Should Have Just Said No

The president asked for a and received a chance to speak before a joint session of .congress to present his jobs’ bill, but Speaker of the House John Boehner should have just said no.  We already know what a “jobs’ bill” means.  It means: more spending, more debt, higher taxes, more research into the effects of cocaine on monkeys (Summertime Blues: 100 Stimulus Projects that Give Taxpayers the Blues), and more unemployment.  He will claim that what he is doing is necessary to save the economy, but in the word’s of Rep. Joe Wilson…

…”you lie.”   Doing these things will hurt the economy.  You need to take money from someone to spend it…wait isn’t that how they claim the rich get rich, by taking from others.  Building roads and bridges, and funding sex ed classes may be a good thing, but they are not economically stimulative.  For these reasons (and the fact that every time he speaks the market tanks) Speaker of the House John Boehner should have said no to President Barack Obama’s request to speak before a joint session of congress.  We’ve heard enough from Obama and his economic policy of Tsunami poverty (it destroys all in it’s path) and instead he should have sent his representatives home to meet with their constituents, We the People.  For the next time President Obama makes a similar request I’ve re-posted an earlier piece I did, on just saying no that might help him.

D.A.R.E.’s 8 Way’s to Say No, Congressional Style (Original Post)

In elementary school I took an anti-drug program.   The program, known as D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) taught techniques to fight the temptation to use drugs and alcohol.   One of these techniques were 8 different ways to say no.   The different ways they suggested to say no to drugs were:  say no thanks,  give an excuse, say no repeatedly, walk away, change the subject, avoid the situation, cold shoulder, and have strength in numbers.   Though this was meant for kids and drugs I think congressional conservatives can learn a lot from this strategy and apply it to dealing with progressives.   Here is how conservatives can adapt D.A.R.E.’s 8 ways to say no:

  1. Say no thanks – If a progressive Congressman or Senator comes up to you and asks you to support a bill that ignores the constitution, gives the government too much power, creates unneeded spending or just goes against your principles, just say No.  Spendaholic: Do you want to support this bill that pays for an airport only I use?  Conservative: No thanks.
  2. Give an excuse – There are some Congressmen who do not have the guts to stand up for their principles in the light of a challenge.  This is the best choice for them in the face of a progressive agenda.  Progressive: Do you want to support this bill that tells people what kind of food they can and cannot eat?  Conservative: No thanks, I kinda want to be re-elected and whether or not I like this bill, my constituents are overwhelmingly against it.
  3. Say no repeatedly - Sometimes saying no once is not enough.  You must stick to your principles.  Keep saying no to those things that go against your principles.  Progressive: We need to ban this thing that is bad for the people, but they don’t recognize it is bad for them.   Will you support the ban?  Conservative: No.   Progressive: But it’ll help the people? Conservative: Will you better understand my answer if it is in Spanish, no.  Progressive: But we need to help people make better decisions?  Conservative: Maybe you’ll understand Russian better, nyet.
  4. Walk away – Sometimes a congressperson must recognize that a bill is just not worth trying to fix, and debating the worth of specific pieces of the bill is just not worth it.  Sometimes one must forget the whole thing and start from scratch.  Progressive: Vote for this bill.   You see this tax issue, it no longer is a problem.   The bill no longer says that you must do this or you will be taxed.  Conservative: No, that specific issue may no longer be a problem, but instead of being explicitly bad, but it leaves it up to the government to decide how to deal with it.  That was not the only issue, the bill is full of problems, but that one was the most blaring.  We need to start from scratch.
  5. Change the subject – At times progressives and politicians in general concentrate on the wrong issue.  They focus on issue S but the people are concentrating on issue A.  Politician 1: We need to reform health care, will you work on coming up with a bill with me?  Politician 2:  Sure, but later.  People are worried about jobs right now, not health care reform.  Now is not the time to worry about health care reform.
  6. Avoid the situation – Sometimes a temptation for bipartisanship at the cost of your principles will be too great for you to resist.  Sometimes someone will just be too enticing for you to stand up to.  Then you should just avoid that person or situation by yourself and use other strategies to help stand up to them.  Also, there are times when a bill or a policy is so bad that that it is not worth debating, discussing or trying to fix it.  Another reason for avoiding a situation is if the people have already spoken about it and either want it or hate it.  Another situation to avoid would be a case where the other party ind the discussion has already decided the outcome.  Example: Republicans, don’t go to the healthcare debate with Obama this Thursday, the people hate the bill and want to keep Grandma for at least a few more years.
  7. Cold shoulder – Sometimes there are those who are just plain irrational, will ignore the facts and make outlandish claims (Alan Grayson; people who call those who go to tea parties tea baggers; those who call all who  disagree with Obama racists) without actually thinking about it just are not worth your time.   They are irrational and as Reagan said, “Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but they know so much that isn’t so.”
  8. Strength in numbers – If one has people they trust and have similar beliefs along with them in a challenging situation, they are more likely to stick to their beliefs.  This works well when people cannot avoid the situation.  Never forget, we are the silent majority.   Be silent no more.
http://www.wtic.com/pages/3029.php

4 Comments

Filed under Politics

God Bless the Soldiers and God Bless America

God bless all those who serve and have served this country and their families. Never forget that freedom is not free.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Even Stalin Would Call them Control Freaks

There are ridiculous government regulations, then there are RIDICULOUS GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS.  I heard of one such case on this week’s episode of NPR’s Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me.  The township of Hopewell, New Jersey has decided to stick its nose into the bedroom.  No, not your bedroom or mine, but the bedrooms of the roosters and hens in the town.  Read the Yahoo article about it.

“HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, N.J. – A New Jersey town has adopted an ordinance that regulates when chickens and roosters can hook up in backyard henhouses.

Roosters must show they’re disease-free and they better not crow about their conquests.

Hopewell Township residents can have up to a half-dozen hens on half-acre lots. Roosters would be allowed only 10 days a year for fertilization purposes.

Mature roosters are not allowed because they’re too noisy. Any roosters that crow too long can be banned from the property for two years.

Mayor Jim Burd told The Times of Trenton the ordinance is a compromise between today’s lifestyle and the township’s agricultural history.” http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110427/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_chickens_conjugal_visits#mwpphu-container

I think even Joseph Stalin would be saying, “WOW, you are controlling,” if he heard about this town.

10 Comments

Filed under Other